Claude press release polisher

A press release drafted by Claude, lede, quote and boilerplate included, is rewritten here toward the confident register a news announcement requires, in place of the hedged phrasing Claude often defaults to. Every fact, figure, name and date is meant to survive the rewrite exactly as submitted.

The rewrite is processed server-side within an allowance of 5 free runs per rolling 24-hour window, no account required.

This caution manifests differently from typical AI hype, and remains equally identifiable to an editor.

A hedged lede

"This may help improve" or "could potentially reduce" opening a release that requires a plain statement of what occurred.

An over-considered quote

An executive quote carrying qualifiers uncommon in actual speech, softened beyond the point of sounding genuine.

Over-explained boilerplate

A company description reading as an extended essay on context, where boilerplate is meant to remain two or three factual sentences.

Heavy subordinate clauses

A lede sentence carrying two or three qualifying clauses in place of a direct statement of the news.

Balanced framing within the lede

A caveat surfacing in the position where the release is meant to lead with the announcement.

The process is deliberately short.

Step 1

Paste the complete release, including dateline, quote and boilerplate.

Step 2

Run it. The text is sent to our AI server, rewritten, and returned within a few seconds.

Step 3

Verify every fact, figure and quote against source records before distribution. The interface shows how many of your 5 runs remain.

The rewrite converts a hedged lede into a direct statement, restates a quote in language resembling actual speech, reduces boilerplate to a plain factual paragraph, and resolves heavy subordinate clauses into shorter sentences.

No fact, figure, date, name or claim is verified, added or checked at any point. That responsibility remains entirely with the submitter and whoever approved the release prior to submission.

A press release's primary function is informing a reporter of what occurred, stated plainly. A reporter reviewing a crowded inbox determines relevance within seconds, and a lede that hedges or qualifies prior to stating the news reads as less consequential, independent of the underlying facts.

Caution belongs in the fact-checking process, not in the lede's construction. Accuracy and confidence in a lede are not in tension.

No, on both counts, and no representation to the contrary is made. This tool rewrites submitted wording. It has no mechanism to confirm whether a figure is accurate, a quote is genuine, or a claim about a product or company is true. That verification remains entirely the submitter's responsibility.

It similarly cannot guarantee a reporter covers the story. What it reliably delivers is a confident announcement stated at the accuracy level the underlying facts support, a genuine improvement independent of subsequent coverage.

Founders and small communications teams who used Claude to produce a careful first draft and require the lede to state the news rather than qualify it.

PR freelancers refining a client's AI-assisted draft prior to distribution, and anyone reviewing their own draft who has observed that the news does not arrive until several sentences in.

A polished release represents progress, not a finished document, and each of the following remains the submitter's responsibility.

Figures are accurate

Revenue numbers, dates, percentages and counts should be checked against source records.

The quote is genuine or approved

Confirm the named individual actually spoke or approved the words attributed to them.

Confidence matches the facts

Where a claim reads more certain than the underlying facts support, it should be scaled back.

Boilerplate reflects current facts

Employee counts, founding dates and mission language become outdated quickly.