DeepSeek press release polisher: rewrite a labeled feature rundown into a lede that leads, no fact-check or coverage promised. 5 runs / 24h.
Free · 5 runs every 24 hours · runs on our AI server
Press release polisher
A press release drafted by DeepSeek is rewritten here toward a lede that states the single most newsworthy fact first, in place of the labeled, exhaustive feature rundown DeepSeek tends to produce. Facts, figures, names and dates are meant to survive the rewrite exactly as submitted.
The rewrite is processed server-side within an allowance of 5 free runs per rolling 24-hour window, no account required.
Diagnosis
An editor reviewing a high volume of submissions identifies this shape quickly: an announcement documented rather than reported.
How it works
The process is deliberately short.
Scope
The rewrite draws the single most newsworthy fact into the lede, collapses colon-labeled clauses into plain sentences, and reduces the feature enumeration to what belongs in a release rather than a specification document, restoring the order an editor expects to find it in.
No fact, figure, date, name or claim is verified, added or checked. That responsibility remains entirely with the submitter and whoever approved the release prior to this tool.
Mechanism
DeepSeek is tuned toward accounting for every relevant detail before determining relative importance, a disposition well suited to a technical problem and poorly suited to a lede that must state one fact first. Tasked with a press release, it enumerates what changed in full rather than selecting the headline.
The thoroughness that serves DeepSeek well on a hard problem produces, in this context, documentation of an announcement rather than a report of it, and a documentation register reads as less newsworthy even when the underlying news is identical.
Direct answer
No, on both counts. This tool rewrites submitted wording. It has no capacity to confirm a figure's accuracy, verify a quote, or establish the truth of a claim about a product or company. That verification remains entirely the submitter's responsibility.
No representation is made regarding media pickup. What is reliably delivered is a release with a lede that leads, distinct from a documented feature list, an improvement independent of whether the underlying story is ultimately covered.
In practice
Technical founders and engineering-led communications teams who received a specification document rather than a lede an editor would read past the first sentence.
PR freelancers preparing a client's AI-assisted draft for distribution, and anyone who has reviewed a DeepSeek-drafted release and observed each sentence labeled like a changelog entry.
All answered in full, nothing to click open.
Paste the full release, including quote and boilerplate, and run it. The single most newsworthy fact is drawn into the lede.
Yes, within the allowance: 5 free runs per rolling 24-hour window, no account required.
No. It rewrites wording only. Verification of every fact, figure and claim remains the submitter's responsibility.
No representation of that kind is made. Coverage depends on the underlying news, not the polish applied.
It accounts for every relevant detail by disposition, listing changes in full rather than selecting the fact a reporter would lead with.
It defaults to structured, labeled coverage of a topic, which reads as documentation rather than news.
Wording is adjusted so the quote reads less like a specification line, without introducing words the speaker did not say. Confirmation with the quoted party remains advisable.
Structure is preserved; boilerplate wording is trimmed toward a plain factual paragraph as part of the same rewrite.
On our AI server. It is not used to train models.
Yes, the same enumeration pattern recurs across announcement types, and is addressed identically regardless of subject matter.
It should not introduce a new factual claim. Any sentence reading as stronger than the original should be corrected before submission.
5 runs on a rolling 24-hour basis, each resetting 24 hours after that specific run.
That is not a claim this tool makes. Detector methods aren't tested against here.
No hard limit is imposed, though a lengthy release is more reliably verified when reviewed in sections.
No. Wording is rewritten; house style and formatting review remain a separate step.
Not currently. Submissions are processed individually within the daily allowance.
The general tool addresses generic AI phrasing. This one specifically targets DeepSeek's labeled, exhaustive-enumeration pattern.
It operates on submitted body copy. A submitted headline receives the same treatment; none is generated from nothing.
Yes, fully, in any modern mobile browser.
Every figure should be fact-checked and the quote confirmed with the named party before the release enters the standard approval process.
Typically, since drawing the news into the lede and reducing the feature enumeration both tend to shorten text rather than extend it.
5 free runs per rolling 24 hours. No account, no promised outcome.
Polish my release