Llama press release polisher: remove exclamation points and restated news, no fact-check or coverage promised. 5 free runs per rolling 24h.
Free · 5 runs every 24 hours · runs on our AI server
Press release polisher
A press release drafted by Llama is rewritten here toward news stated once, plainly, in place of the exclamation points and restated announcement Llama tends to introduce into even a short release. Facts, figures, names and dates are meant to survive the rewrite exactly as submitted.
The rewrite is processed server-side within an allowance of 5 free runs per rolling 24-hour window, no account required.
Diagnosis
An editor reviewing a high volume of submissions identifies this shape quickly: news stated, then restated, in a warmer register than the genre calls for.
How it works
The process is deliberately short.
Scope
The rewrite removes exclamation points, eliminates the announcement restated a second time, and reduces a quote to a specific, citable statement rather than generic reassurance.
No fact, figure, date, name or claim is verified, added or checked. That responsibility remains entirely with the submitter and whoever approved the release prior to this tool.
Mechanism
Llama defaults to a warm, agreeable, encouraging register across most tasks, an asset in conversational exchange and a mismatch for a genre read quickly and skeptically by an editor determining newsworthiness.
The tendency toward thoroughness and reassurance manifests as restating the announcement in different words, under the apparent premise that repetition strengthens the news, though an editor scanning quickly simply encounters the same fact twice.
Direct answer
No, on both counts. This tool rewrites submitted wording. It has no capacity to confirm a figure's accuracy, verify a quote, or establish the truth of a claim about a product or company. That verification remains entirely the submitter's responsibility.
No representation is made regarding media pickup. What is reliably delivered is news stated once, plainly, in place of a repeated announcement, an improvement independent of whether the underlying story is ultimately covered.
In practice
Startup founders and small communications teams who received a release reading as an enthusiastic reply rather than a statement an editor would take seriously.
PR freelancers preparing a client's AI-assisted draft for distribution, and anyone who has reviewed a Llama-drafted release and identified the same announcement stated twice.
All answered in full, nothing to click open.
Paste the full release, including quote and boilerplate, and run it. Exclamation points and restated news are rewritten into a single, plain statement.
Yes, within the allowance: 5 free runs per rolling 24-hour window, no account required.
No. It rewrites wording only. Verification of every fact, figure and claim remains the submitter's responsibility.
No representation of that kind is made. Coverage depends on the underlying news, not the polish applied.
It defaults to a warm, enthusiastic register across most tasks, out of place in a genre read fast and skeptically by an editor.
It tends toward thoroughness and reassurance, which manifests as repeating the news in different words rather than stating it once.
Wording is adjusted so the quote reads as a specific, citable statement rather than generic reassurance, without introducing words the speaker did not say. Confirmation with the quoted party remains advisable.
Structure is preserved; boilerplate wording receives the same repetition and tone correction as the rest of the release.
On our AI server. It is not used to train models.
Yes, the same restated-news pattern recurs across announcement types, and is addressed identically regardless of subject matter.
It should not introduce a new factual claim. Any sentence reading as stronger than the original should be corrected before submission.
5 runs on a rolling 24-hour basis, each resetting 24 hours after that specific run.
That is not a claim this tool makes. Detector methods aren't tested against here.
No hard limit is imposed, though a lengthy release is more reliably verified when reviewed in sections.
No. Wording is rewritten; house style and formatting review remain a separate step.
Not currently. Submissions are processed individually within the daily allowance.
The general tool addresses generic AI phrasing. This one specifically targets Llama's exclamation-point and restated-news pattern.
It operates on submitted body copy. A submitted headline receives the same treatment; none is generated from nothing.
Yes, fully, in any modern mobile browser.
Every figure should be fact-checked and the quote confirmed with the named party before the release enters the standard approval process.
It is built and tested primarily for English. Other languages may function, though quality is not guaranteed to the same standard.
Typically, since removing a restated announcement tends to shorten a release rather than lengthen it.
5 free runs per rolling 24 hours. No account, no promised outcome.
Polish my release